|
If we wish to violently define, if not actually codify, the
representations, we can note, beyond the evident manifestation, two overwhelming
propositions which can be recounted in this way: a real image of a barefoot
vagabond, a woman, who any of us could meet along the way, and a phantasm
who moves through the dark streets, dressed, that is proposed, in such a
way that no one could think they had met her.
A well-known image, thus, part of everyone's memory which the film portrays as having been abandoned in order to realize a clear social identity as Architect. But once she has achieved this mature social identity, oddly enough, a phantasm reappears, the phantasm of a voice, a shadow, an image of a male vagabond weary and in need of help. |
| Next page |